Which learning activities enhance physical therapist practice? Part 2: Systematic review of qualitative studies and thematic synthesis

Objective. Post-professional physical therapy expertise requires career-long participation in learning activities. Understanding physical therapists’ lived experience of learning activities provides novel insight into how best to enhance physical therapist practice from the perspective of the learner. The purpose of this study was to explore qualified physical therapists’ experiences, beliefs, and perspectives with regard to learning activities and professional development. Methods. Eight databases were searched for studies published from inception through December 2018. Study selection included mixed-methods and qualitative studies exploring physical therapists’ experiences, perspectives, beliefs and attitudes. Thematic synthesis was performed, and the GRADE-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) was used to assess the level of confidence in the findings. Forty-one studies with 719 participants were included. Results. The key findings include physical therapists’ perceptions that worthwhile post professional learning requires more than attendance at professional development courses. Physical therapists perceived that worthwhile learning requires connection with others and being “taken out of ones’ comfort zone.” Sufficient time and accessible, trustworthy resources were also valued. Conclusions. Moderate- to low-level evidence suggests that the choice of professional development activities and education design for qualified physical therapists should consider the inclusion of connected activities, activities that take participants out of comfort zones, time to practice, and trustworthy resources that are easily accessible. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of learning activities encompassing these factors, prioritizing those that minimize the barriers of time and distance. Impact. This study adds to the profession’s understanding of physical therapists’ lived experience of learning activities, providing novel insight into how best to enhance physical therapist practice from the perspective of the learner

Which learning activities enhance physical therapist practice? Part 1: Systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies

Objective. Following graduation from professional education, the development of clinical expertise requires career-long participation in learning activities. The purpose of study was to evaluate which learning activities enhanced physical therapist practice. Methods. Eight databases were searched for studies published from inception through December 2018. Articles reporting quantitative data evaluating the effectiveness of learning activities completed by qualified physical therapists were included. Study characteristics and results were extracted from the 26 randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. Clinician (knowledge, affective attributes, and behavior) and patient related outcomes were extracted. Results: There was limited evidence that professional development courses improved physical therapist knowledge. There was low-level evidence that peer assessment and feedback was more effective than case discussion at improving knowledge (SMD = 0.35, 95%CI = 0.09-0.62). Results were inconsistent for the effect of learning activities on affective attributes. Courses with active learning components appeared more effective at changing physical therapist behavior. The completion of courses by physical therapists did not improve patient outcomes; however, the addition of a mentored patient interaction appeared impactful. Conclusions. Current evidence suggests active approaches, such as peer assessment and mentored patient interactions, should be used when designing learning activities for physical therapists. Further high-quality research focused on evaluating the impact of active learning interventions on physical therapist practice and patient outcomes is now needed. Impact. This study is a first step in determining which learning activities enhance clinical expertise and practice would enable the physical therapy profession to make informed decisions about the allocation of professional development resources

Which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice? : a systematic review protocol of quantitative and qualitative studies

Background: Learning activities are fundamental for the development of expertise in physiotherapy practice. Continuing professional development (CPD) encompasses formal and informal learning activities undertaken by physiotherapists. Identifying the most efficient and effective learning activities is essential to enable the profession to assimilate research findings and improve clinical skills to ensure the most efficacious care for clients. To date, systematic reviews on the effectiveness of CPD provide limited guidance on the most efficacious models of professional development for physiotherapists. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice. Methods: A search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO (Psychological Abstracts), PEDro, Cochrane Library, AMED and Educational Resources and Information Center (ERIC) will be completed. Citation searching and reference list searching will be undertaken to locate additional studies. Quantitative and qualitative studies will be included if they examine the impact of learning activities on clinician’s behaviour, attitude, knowledge, beliefs, skills, self-efficacy, work satisfaction and patient outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed by two independent researchers. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) will be used to synthesise results where a meta-analysis is possible. Where a meta-analysis is not possible, a narrative synthesis will be conducted

Does online professional development for physical therapists enhance clinical practice and patient outcomes? : protocol for a mixed methods, randomized controlled trial

Objective: Online clinical mentoring has shown potential as a flexible professional development activity that enhances physical therapist practice. Online delivery can overcome time and distance barriers to participation in professional development. The impact of this learning activity on physical therapist practice and patient outcomes has not been rigorously tested. Thus, the aim of this study is to determine whether online clinical mentoring is more effective than asynchronous online lectures at improving physical therapist practice and patient outcomes. An additional aim is to explore the lived experience of physical therapist learners who participate in online clinical mentoring. Methods: In this mixed methods evaluation, 24 physical therapist learners will be randomized to 1 of 2 online professional development activities. Experimental group physical therapists will complete 6 online clinical mentoring sessions. Control group physical therapists will complete 6 online lectures. The primary outcome evaluated will be the effect on the physical therapist's patients, using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale. Physical therapist learner secondary outcomes are confidence, self-reflection, and satisfaction. Accounting for possible dropouts, a sample size of 216 patients was determined using a pragmatic sample of 24 physical therapists, power of 0.80, alpha of 0.05, and between-group differences of 1.0 (SD = 2.0) on the Patient-Specific Functional Scale. Consecutive, eligible patients under the care of the physical therapist learners will complete outcome measures at initial appointment and at 4 weeks follow-up. Linear mixed model regression analysis will be used to estimate treatment effects from the posttreatment group means at 4 weeks. Participants undertaking online clinical mentoring will complete semi-structured interviews that will be thematically analyzed using a phenomenological approach. Impact: This research study will establish the effectiveness of online clinical mentoring to inform future professional development. The qualitative component will identify the potential mechanisms by which online clinical mentoring might be effective, thus informing future implementation of this professional development activity